Home Culture Leaked Audio Proves That The New York Times Is Colluding Against Trump

Leaked Audio Proves That The New York Times Is Colluding Against Trump


There are multiple alleged proofs of liberal media making fake news reports, but today we have official proof!

Leaked audio from The New York Times proves that the purportedly unbiased newspaper is out to get President Donald Trump.

The leaked audio, which was acquired by Slate, showed Executive Editor Dean Baquet talking to his board after the paper published a headline that made the president look good.

And the scam is simple. The Trump and Russia collusion story that they cashed in on for two years is a flop and now they need a new anti-Trump story.

“We built our newsroom to cover one story, and we did it truly well,” he said. “Now we have to regroup, and shift resources and emphasis to take on a different story.”

He said that the answer to the paper is “to write about race and class in a deeper way than we have in years.”

“Chapter 1 of the story of Donald Trump, not only for our newsroom but, frankly, for our readers, was: Did Donald Trump have untoward relationships with the Russians, and was there obstruction of justice?

“That was a really hard story, by the way, let’s not forget that. We set ourselves up to cover that story. I’m going to say it.

“We won two Pulitzer Prizes covering that story. And I think we covered that story better than anybody else,” he said.

“The day Bob Mueller walked off that witness stand, two things happened,” he said. “Our readers who want Donald Trump to go away suddenly thought, ‘Holy shit, Bob Mueller is not going to do it.’

“And Donald Trump got a little emboldened politically, I think. Because, you know, for obvious reasons. And I think that the story changed.

Baquet used the gentlest terms possible — “the story changed” — but the fact is, the conspiracy-coordination allegation the Times had devoted itself to pursuing turned out to be false. Beyond that, Democrats on Capitol Hill struggled to press an obstruction case against the president. The Trump-Russia hole came up dry.

Now, Baquet continued, “I think that we’ve got to change.” The Times must “write more deeply about the country, race, and other divisions.”

“A lot of the stuff we’re talking about started to emerge like six or seven weeks ago. We’re a little tiny bit flat-footed. I mean, that’s what happens when a story looks a certain way for two years. Right?” he said.

Translation: We pushed a conspiracy theory for two years and when we got found out we decided to create a new one.

How does this not set them up for a lawsuit? They just admitted to what we knew all along under the guise of the 1st Amendment. And they’re still getting away with it.

There should be a special prosecutor to weed out this level of corruption. it is fraud and electioneering and abuse of the power and should be treated as such. the new york times has a special place in our society and it is abusing that power.