Home Opinion Here’s The Real Reason Handlers Rushed to Correct Joe’s End Of The...

Here’s The Real Reason Handlers Rushed to Correct Joe’s End Of The Pandemic Remark

President Biden said in a 60 Minutes interview Sunday that the COVID-19 pandemic is a thing of the past.

“The pandemic is over,” he said. “We still have a problem with COVID. We’re still doing a lot of work on it. But the pandemic is over. If you notice, no one’s wearing masks. Everybody seems to be in pretty good shape, and so I think it’s changing, and I think [the Detroit auto show resuming after three years] is a perfect example of it.”

His handlers tried to correct the “confused” President!

The Biden administration is largely downplaying President Joe Biden’s comments declaring the coronavirus pandemic “over,” suggesting his remarks signal a continuation of the White House’s evolving stance toward the pandemic over the past few months.

There are more reasons why his handlers rushed to correct his pandemic remarks!

Biden has used the COVID-19 pandemic emergency as a reason for his administration’s plan to end Title 42 as well as the recent student loan handout.

His remarks also came as Biden’s own administration seeks an additional $22.4 billion from Congress to keep funding the fight against COVID, and as the United States continues to see hundreds of related deaths every day.

But it was his Handlers who were the most freaked about what Joe said, and they literally grabbed their mops and BOLTED for the door. They had to clean this one up quickly.


What’s the big deal, most people are back to normal by now, even a lot of blue states…

Well, I’ll tell you why: Emergency Powers.

The powers that the left gets from this “pandemic” are way too good to pass up. That’s why they came out so fast to put the breaks on what Joe said.

The reason Biden’s staff keeps contradicting him on the pandemic is that they understand all too well that the emergency powers that the pandemic conveys (or can be said to convey) are pretty much all they’ve got going for them.”

OPINION: This article contains commentary which reflects the author’s opinion